health Archives | https://blog.von-keller.com/tag/health/ Mon, 13 Oct 2025 04:29:20 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1 https://blog.von-keller.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/BOARDROOM-ICON-blk-150x150.png health Archives | https://blog.von-keller.com/tag/health/ 32 32 None of the tuna retailers in the United States passed the sustainability and human rights tests. https://blog.von-keller.com/none-of-the-tuna-retailers-in-the-united-states-passed-the-sustainability-and-human-rights-tests/ https://blog.von-keller.com/none-of-the-tuna-retailers-in-the-united-states-passed-the-sustainability-and-human-rights-tests/#respond Thu, 16 Mar 2023 14:43:14 +0000 https://www.blog.von-keller.org/?p=1703 None of the tuna retailers in the United States passed the sustainability and human rights tests. Tuna production is at an all-time high. Part of this increase can be attributed to it being viewed as an environmentally friendly alternative to other animal proteins for people looking to reduce their meat consumption. However, according to a […]

The post None of the tuna retailers in the United States passed the sustainability and human rights tests. appeared first on .

]]>

None of the tuna retailers in the United States passed the sustainability and human rights tests.

Tuna production is at an all-time high. Part of this increase can be attributed to it being viewed as an environmentally friendly alternative to other animal proteins for people looking to reduce their meat consumption.

However, according to a new report by the environmental NGO Greenpeace,” High cost for cheap tuna“, despite significant progress, U.S. grocery chains still have a long way to go in addressing serious environmental and human rights concerns in their tuna sourcing.

In accordance with the report, the United States is the world’s second-largest tuna importer, and its retailers utilize significant clout in the $42 billion global tuna sector. Since 2008, Greenpeace has ranked US seafood retailers based on sustainability criteria. This is the second report of its kind to include human rights considerations.

The report’s authors created a scorecard for the 16 largest U.S. grocery retailers based on their tuna sourcing practices. To accomplish this, they distributed a survey, which 11 of the retailers completed

and returned, and relied on publicly available data for the remaining five. They assigned percentage academic results to retailers based on 39 questions grouped into six categories: purchasing policy, record keeping, advocacy and initiatives, human rights and labor protections, current sourcing, and customer education and labeling.

picture of tuna at grocery store

Retailers with high ratings are still rated too low.

The report praised ALDI for its “comprehensive, publicly available seafood and human rights policies” and explicit advocacy “for a living wage for workers in its supply chain.” The limited scope of its grievance mechanisms and the fact that its corporate responsibility supplier evaluation program is still in development lowered its score.

Southeastern Grocers, the parent company of Fresco y Más, Harveys Supermarket, and Winn-Dixie, received the lowest human rights rating.

Transshipment is the practice of offloading a fishing vessel’s catch onto other boats that deliver it to shore. It is frequently associated with illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, and because it allows fishing vessels to stay at sea for extended periods of time, it also increases the risk of human and labor rights violations in supply chains.

Amazon-owned Whole Foods Market, the largest U.S. chain specializing in “natural” and organic foods, received the highest score of 75% for sustainability. ALDI came in second with 70%, bringing its total overall score to 62%, the first and only passing grade since the addition of human rights factors to the rankings last year. The authors lauded Whole Foods’ stringent traceability and sourcing standards, including its pledge to sell only pole-and-line and hand-line-caught canned tuna. These methods reduce bycatch and overfishing more than other methods, and they benefit human rights because vessels are smaller and tend to work along the coast rather than in the open ocean, resulting in shorter periods at sea and more localized employment.

Costco was ranked second-to-last in terms of sustainability, with a score of 32%. Critics focused on its “vague” sourcing and seafood sustainability policies, as well as its lack of a transshipment policy.

Should we phaseout transshipment

According to Greenpeace research, this frequently results in tuna products with suspicious environmental and social qualifications being available on supermarket shelves in the United States, despite grocery chains’ assurances to the contrary. According to the news release, Greenpeace linked tuna caught by vessels that supply the ubiquitous canned-tuna brand Bumble Bee to forced labor, human trafficking, and IUU fishing practices in 2020, and then traced the tuna to a Kroger-owned Harris Teeter in Arlington, Virginia.

The report calls for increased tracking and tracing and openness in the tuna supply chain. It requests that retailers follow the example of employee-owned supermarket chain Hy-Vee (which ranked fourth overall in the report) and make a complete list of their supplying vessels public. It also wants to ban transshipment.

Von Keller Blog is an informational website with public news, company insights and reports of our companies events, news, press and blogging. Let’s Chat.

fish on ground in china market

The post None of the tuna retailers in the United States passed the sustainability and human rights tests. appeared first on .

]]>
https://blog.von-keller.com/none-of-the-tuna-retailers-in-the-united-states-passed-the-sustainability-and-human-rights-tests/feed/ 0
Environmental: Proposed Changes to Protect American Families Drinking Water. https://blog.von-keller.com/environmental-proposed-changes-to-protect-american-families-drinking-water/ Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:46:41 +0000 https://www.blog.von-keller.org/?p=1618 Picture Courtesy of Travis Long / Associated Press

The post Environmental: Proposed Changes to Protect American Families Drinking Water. appeared first on .

]]>

Environmental: Proposed Changes to Protect American Families' Drinking Water.

The EPA is warning that two nonstick and stain-resistant compounds found in drinking water are more dangerous than previously thought, posing health risks even at levels so low that they cannot currently be detected, coined “Forever Chemicals”

Although PFOA and PFOS have been voluntarily phased out by American manufacturers, there are still certain uses for the chemicals, and because they do not degrade over time, they are still present in the environment. The substances are a subset of PFAS, a wider group of “forever chemicals” that have been present in industrial and consumer items since the 1940s.

This Monday, the EPA released a “quasi” health recommendations, replacing 2016 standards that had placed the health risk levels for PFOA and PFOS at 70 parts per trillion. Products including cardboard packing, carpets, and firefighting foam contain the chemicals.

What are PFOA, PFOS, and PFAS?

Both PFOA and PFOS… the man-made substances that were once employed in the production of many different consumer goods. While they temporarily ease life, they have severe negative long-term implications on both human and environmental health.

Perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate–more commonly referred to as PFOA and PFOS, respectively–are fluorinated organic compounds that are part of larger group of compounds known as perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

These synthetic compounds are notorious for not being affected by lipids or water. PFOA and PFOS were widely employed to coat goods that were intended to be stain-resistant, waterproof, or non-stick (like DuPont’s Teflon) once production ramped up in the 1950s. While being practical, these highly fluorinated chemicals are linked to some major health issues. The fact that they linger in the environment for a very, very long time only serves to exacerbate their harmful impact on human health.

The will “Never Break Down”  in the environment at all.

PFOA and PFOS in our Drinking Water

In 2016, PFOA contamination was discovered in 1% of samples taken from public drinking water systems around the country. Despite this, PFOA and PFOS levels in drinking water are not officially regulated by the EPA. The EPA did issue temporary health advisories for the substances in 2009.

For PFOS and PFOA in public water systems, the EPA upgraded the 2009 standards with lifelong health advisories in 2016. 

Nico De Pasquale Photography / Getty Images

It informed towns that it was unsafe for drinking water sources to include levels of PFOA and PFOS (combined) above 70 ppt.

According to epidemiological data in human populations and ongoing research on laboratory animals, the EPA has hypothesized that exposure to PFOA and PFOS above a threshold may have the following effects on human health:

  • Effects on development
  • Cancer
  • Liver injury
  • autoimmune diseases
  • Thyroid dysfunction
  • Heart-related issues

How has Europe made similar changes?

There European started making similar changes back in 2020 as follows:

  • 2020 saw the revision of the EU’s Drinking Water Directive to limit total PFAS to 500 ng/l.
  • The EU will prohibit the use of all PFAS in firefighting foams and other applications, only allowing their use in situations where they are actually necessary for society.
  • In order to work on PFAS remediation, the EU has asked for proposals under the Green Deal and is providing subsidies to encourage research.
    According to research conducted in the UK between 2014 and 2019 on lakes, rivers, groundwaters, estuaries, and coastal waters, PFAS are widely distributed in English surface and groundwaters.
  • According to the UK Drinking Water Inspectorate’s findings, there have been no notifications of PFAS levels in drinking water that are higher than recommended.
    PFAS are often examined using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry.
  • Fluoride-containing compound screening can be done using combustion ion chromatography.
  • See more.

What is next?

With federal financial support, water companies that provide services to urban regions should be able to spread out costs with the aid of the federal government in a manner similar to that of an advocacy group that works to remove dangerous substances from food, water, clothing, and other products. There are currently PFAS drinking water limitations in place in a number of states. 

The House passed legislation that would mandate the EPA to establish discharge limits for a number of companies suspected of discharging PFAS into the water and create a national threshold for PFAS in drinking water. In the Senate, the bill is deadlocked.

Von Keller Blog is an informational website with public news, company insights and reports of our companies events, news, press and blogging. Let’s Chat.

Photo:Damir Mijailovic Pexel

The post Environmental: Proposed Changes to Protect American Families Drinking Water. appeared first on .

]]>
Meat vs. Plant Protein: 7 Comparisons https://blog.von-keller.com/meat-vs-plant-protein-7-comparisons/ Tue, 14 Mar 2023 04:59:33 +0000 https://www.blog.von-keller.org/2017/12/26/getting-enough-protien/ Meat vs. Plant Protein: 7 Comparisons When researchers compared the nutritional profiles of plants and meat, the results were astounding. Astonishingly, plants are just as good as meat for protein, but plants have additional health benefits from phyto- and micronutrients that you may not be aware of.   Ground Beef vs. Black Beans GROUND BEEF: 3 […]

The post Meat vs. Plant Protein: 7 Comparisons appeared first on .

]]>

Meat vs. Plant Protein: 7 Comparisons

When researchers compared the nutritional profiles of plants and meat, the results were astounding. Astonishingly, plants are just as good as meat for protein, but plants have additional health benefits from phyto- and micronutrients that you may not be aware of.

 

string bean, beans, assortment-3861864.jpg
beef, bowl, cooking-1846030.jpg

Ground Beef vs. Black Beans

GROUND BEEF: 3 oz = 22g protein   |  BLACK BEANS: 1.5 cups = 22.5g protein

Beef and beans are befitting adversaries in the “which has the most protein” contest. When the environmental and nutritional impact of the two are compared, black beans win hands down for being easier on the Earth, easier on the body, easier to prepare and eat, and providing more nutritional benefit than a hamburger patty.

anacardium, cashew, cashew nuts-3523449.jpg
steak, beef steak, fillet-4394612.jpg

Steak vs. Cashews

STEAK: 4 oz = 40g protein CASHEWS: 1 cup = 40g protein

It appears unlikely that a cup of cashew nuts could contain the same amount of protein as a 4oz steak. But it’s true. Not only that, but cashews have a high nutritional value with 83 milligrams of magnesium, 168 milligrams of phosphorus, and 187 milligrams of potassium per ounce.

pumpkin seeds, snack, food-5612187.jpg
turkey, roast, meal-315079.jpg

Turkey vs. Pumpkin Seeds

TURKEY: 3 oz = 26gram of  protein – PUMPKIN SEEDS: ¾ cup = 30g protein

When we compared pumpkin seeds to turkey meat, we found that a mere handful contains more glutamate, zinc, and phytosterols than turkey. When it comes to protein, both are comparable, but why not load up on copper, manganese, phosphorous, vitamin K, E, and B while you’re at it? Pumpkin seeds are far more efficient to grow than turkey seeds and are far less harmful to the environment.

White Meat Chicken vs. Lentil Beans

CHICKEN: 3 oz = 26gram of  protein – LENTIL BEANS:1.5 cup = 27g protein

A small 1.5 cup serving of lentils contains the same amount of protein as a 3 oz chicken breast, but lentils also contain dietary fiber, copper, phosphorus, and manganese that you cannot get from meat. To easily replace the chicken on Meatless Monday, look for veggie patties made from lentils at your local health food store.

Salmon Fish vs. Peanut Butter

Salmon 3 oz = 23 gram of  protein – Nut Butter:  .5 cup = 32g protein

Salmon and peanuts are both high in Omega-6 fatty acids and potassium and are both excellent sources of protein. One tablespoon of peanut butter contains 8g of protein, making it a popular pick-me-up snack for athletes. It’s common to mistake the peanut for a nut, but it’s actually a legume, and as a legume, it’s high in dietary fiber, bone-building magnesium, and skin-smoothing Vitamin E.

meat
green-spirulina-smoothie-featured-1

Tilapia vs. Spirulina

TILAPIA 3.5 oz = 22 gram of  protein – SPIRULINA  .5 cup = 20g protein

Both are high in protein and come from the ocean, but the ancient blue-green algae may actually help remove toxins like arsenic with every spoonful. Spirulina contains 8 essential amino acids and is high in potassium, calcium, and zinc. It is a natural detoxifier and anti-inflammatory that requires no preparation. Add it to salad dressings and smoothies.

Pork vs. Split Peas

PORK 4 oz = 30 gram of  protein – SPLIT PEAS:  2 cup = 30 g protein

 

Pork and peas match up pretty well. Peas contain 16g of dietary fiber per cup and are high in potassium, magnesium, and iron. They’ve recently gained popularity as a base protein for plant-based protein powders.

Von Keller Blog is an informational website with public news, company insights and reports of our companies events, news, press and blogging. Let’s Chat.

The post Meat vs. Plant Protein: 7 Comparisons appeared first on .

]]>